The Same AI Can Help or Harm Learning
Research this week showed that AI support can produce very different outcomes for different students and different tasks. The tool is not neutral, but its effect is also not fixed.
Research this week showed that AI support can produce very different outcomes for different students and different tasks. The tool is not neutral, but its effect is also not fixed.
What Happened This Week
On June 9, the Virginia Beach School Board sat through nearly two hours of public comment and then took a 7-4 vote on a substitute Chromebook policy.12
On Tuesday, the USC Center for Generative AI and Society released a report drawing on a national survey of a thousand American undergraduates, an experimental trial of a writing tool called ABE, and a survey of more than fifteen hundred teachers across India, the United States, Qatar, Colombia, and the Philippines.34
On Wednesday, June 17, the Wake County Public School System, the largest district in North Carolina, sat with the longest draft of an AI policy the state has yet produced.56
On Wednesday, June 24, Microsoft released the third edition of its annual AI in Education Report.78
On June 10, the National Center for Education Statistics released the long-term trend assessment for nine- and thirteen-year-olds in reading and mathematics.910
On June 24, Microsoft released the third edition of its annual AI in Education report.711
On June 24, Gallup released a study of more than 2,400 Gen Zers conducted with the Walton Family Foundation and Harvard's Making Caring Common Project.1213
What These Stories Have in Common
A model that gives an answer may improve the assignment while weakening the skill the assignment was meant to develop. A model that asks questions can slow the work down enough for the student to notice an error and correct it.
Koan starts from a simple premise. The final answer is no longer a reliable measure of learning. Schools need to understand how students reached that answer and whether the work made them more capable.
What Schools Can Do
Schools should evaluate AI at the level of the interaction. They need to know what the model said, what the student did next, and whether the student became more capable over time.
The educational value of AI is determined by the thinking it creates, not the text it produces.
References
Virginia Beach school board adopts less restrictive Chromebook policy, bars usage in pre-K and kindergarten
WHRO · June 9, 2026
Central Virginia parents urge schools to balance technology and hands-on learning in classrooms
WRIC ABC 8News · June 2026
AI is changing how students learn — or avoid learning
USC Today · June 23, 2026
USC Report on AI in Education Released
USC Institute for Creative Technologies · June 2026
No AI detectors, more citations. What's in a new Wake schools' AI policy draft
WRAL · June 18, 2026
Wake County student says clear AI policies needed after being accused of cheating
WRAL · May 2026
Microsoft's New AI in Education Report highlights widespread adoption and increasing demand for support
Microsoft Source · June 24, 2026
AI in education is changing fast: New Microsoft 365 Education experiences put learning first
Microsoft Education Blog · June 2026
NAEP long-term trend tests show reading, math gains for 9-year-olds
NPR · June 10, 2026
9-year-olds show some growth as 13-year-olds stagnate in NAEP long-term trends
K-12 Dive · June 10, 2026
Microsoft AI in Education report shows 92% use
Stock Titan · June 24, 2026
Many Gen Zers Missing Sense of Meaning or Purpose in Life
Gallup · June 24, 2026
For many Gen Zers, fears are barriers to a life of purpose
CNN · June 24, 2026
Sources cited in order of appearance. Click any inline number to jump.